Files
n8n/packages/@n8n/ai-workflow-builder.ee/evaluations/evaluators/responder/responder-judge.prompt.ts
T
alighasami 3d5eaf9445
Security: Sync from Public / sync-from-public (push) Has been cancelled
Test: Benchmark Nightly / build (push) Has been cancelled
Test: Benchmark Nightly / Notify Cats on failure (push) Has been cancelled
CI: Python / Checks (push) Has been cancelled
Test: Evals Python / Workflow Comparison Python (push) Has been cancelled
Util: Check Docs URLs / check-docs-urls (push) Has been cancelled
Test: Visual Storybook / Cloudflare Pages (push) Has been cancelled
Test: E2E Performance / build-and-test-performance (push) Has been cancelled
Test: Workflows Nightly / Run Workflow Tests (push) Has been cancelled
Util: Cleanup CI Docker Images / Delete stale CI images (push) Has been cancelled
Test: Benchmark Destroy Env / build (push) Has been cancelled
Util: Update Node Popularity / update-popularity (push) Has been cancelled
Test: E2E Coverage Weekly / Coverage Tests (push) Has been cancelled
first commit
2026-03-17 16:22:57 +03:30

132 lines
4.4 KiB
TypeScript

import { prompt } from '@/prompts/builder';
/**
* Responder evaluation types that map to different evaluation strategies.
*
* Currently all responses happen after a full workflow generation.
* Plan mode types can be added later when that feature is implemented.
*/
export type ResponderEvalType = 'workflow_summary' | 'datatable_instructions' | 'general_response';
export interface ResponderEvalCriteria {
type: ResponderEvalType;
criteria: string;
}
const FORBIDDEN_PHRASES = [
'activate workflow',
'activate the workflow',
'click the activate button',
];
function buildForbiddenPhrasesSection(): string {
return FORBIDDEN_PHRASES.map((p) => `- "${p}"`).join('\n');
}
function buildTypeSpecificGuidance(evalType: ResponderEvalType): string {
switch (evalType) {
case 'workflow_summary':
return `
Additionally evaluate:
- Does the response accurately describe the workflow that was built?
- Are all key nodes and their purposes mentioned?
- Is the explanation of the workflow flow logical and complete?
- Does it explain how the workflow addresses the user request?
- Are setup instructions (credentials, placeholders) clearly provided?
`;
case 'datatable_instructions':
return `
Additionally evaluate:
- Are the data table creation instructions clear and actionable?
- Do the column names/types match what the workflow expects?
- Is the user told exactly what to create manually?
`;
case 'general_response':
return '';
}
}
function buildWorkflowSummary(workflowJSON: unknown): string {
if (!workflowJSON || typeof workflowJSON !== 'object') {
return 'No workflow data available';
}
const workflow = workflowJSON as { nodes?: Array<{ name?: string; type?: string }> };
if (!Array.isArray(workflow.nodes) || workflow.nodes.length === 0) {
return 'Empty workflow (no nodes)';
}
const nodeList = workflow.nodes
.map((node: { name?: string; type?: string }) => {
const name = node.name ?? 'unnamed';
const type = node.type ?? 'unknown';
return `- ${name} (${type})`;
})
.join('\n');
return `Workflow contains ${workflow.nodes.length} nodes:\n${nodeList}`;
}
/**
* Build the LLM judge prompt for evaluating a responder output.
*/
export function buildResponderJudgePrompt(args: {
userPrompt: string;
responderOutput: string;
evalCriteria: ResponderEvalCriteria;
workflowJSON?: unknown;
}): string {
const { userPrompt, responderOutput, evalCriteria, workflowJSON } = args;
const typeGuidance = buildTypeSpecificGuidance(evalCriteria.type);
const hasWorkflow = workflowJSON !== undefined;
return prompt()
.section(
'role',
'You are an expert evaluator assessing the quality of an AI assistant response in a workflow automation context.',
)
.section(
'task',
`
Evaluate the responder output against the provided criteria.
Score each dimension from 0.0 to 1.0.
Return your evaluation as JSON with this exact structure:
\`\`\`json
{
"relevance": { "score": 0.0, "comment": "..." },
"accuracy": { "score": 0.0, "comment": "..." },',
"completeness": { "score": 0.0, "comment": "..." },
"clarity": { "score": 0.0, "comment": "..." },
"tone": { "score": 0.0, "comment": "..." },',
"criteriaMatch": { "score": 0.0, "comment": "..." },
"forbiddenPhrases": { "score": 0.0, "comment": "..." },
"overallScore": 0.0,',
"summary": "..."
}
\`\`\`
`,
)
.section(
'dimensions',
`
**relevance** (0-1): Does the response address the user request?'
**accuracy** (0-1): Is the information factually correct? If a workflow is provided, verify that the responder's claims about the workflow (nodes, integrations, actions) match what was actually built."
**completeness** (0-1): Does it cover everything needed?
**clarity** (0-1): Is the response well-structured and easy to understand?
**tone** (0-1): Is the tone professional and helpful?',
**criteriaMatch** (0-1): Does it satisfy the specific evaluation criteria below?
**forbiddenPhrases** (0-1): 1.0 if no forbidden phrases are present, 0.0 if any are found.
`,
)
.section('forbiddenPhrases', buildForbiddenPhrasesSection())
.section('userPrompt', userPrompt)
.section('responderOutput', responderOutput)
.sectionIf(hasWorkflow, 'actualWorkflow', () => buildWorkflowSummary(workflowJSON))
.section('evaluationCriteria', evalCriteria.criteria)
.sectionIf(typeGuidance.length > 0, 'typeSpecificGuidance', typeGuidance)
.build();
}